Here you can find information about national and international conferences, workshops, seminars and PhD courses taking place outside of the framework of the Nordic network in Memory Studies, as well as other relevant links.
***
Call for Papers: Memory - Silence, Screen and Spectacle, March 24-26 2011,The New School, New York. Abstracts are due November 22, 2010
Please see the following link:
http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/subpage.aspx?id=57135
Concentrationary Imaginaries/Imaginaries of Violence in Contemporary Cultures and Cultural Forms
Keynote Speakers:
Andrew Benjamin (Monash) Adriana Cavarero (Verona)
Paul Gilroy (LSE) Ian James (Cambridge)
Paul Willemen (Ulster) Samuel Weber (Northwestern)
With a plenary by Zygmunt Bauman (Leeds)
An international transdisciplinary conference organized by the AHRC Research Project Concentrationary Memories: The Politics of Representation directed by Griselda Pollock(Centre for Cultural Analysis, Theory and History) and Max Silverman(Centre for French and Francophone Cultural Studies)
April 13-15 2011
University of Leeds
In 1946 French Trotskyist political deportee to Buchenwald coined the phrase ‘concentrationary universe’ to describe the terrifying sociological experiment in total destruction of humanity in which, according to Hannah Arendt, ‘everything is possible’. Our question is: has anything of the concentrationary universe seeped into and been disseminated through contemporary culture? Going beyond the work of Agamben and Virilio who suggest that the camp and war are now the matrices of modern society, we want to enquire into cultural forms and subjectivities. Is there now a concentrationary imaginary? What would be its indices, symptoms, locations, tropes and affects? Where might we find it? Is the concentrationary a dimension of heightened violence, of fantasies of apocalyptic, end-of-time confrontations, of the manner in which ‘others’ are projected as both fascinating and deadly? Is it about thoughtlessness and amnesia? Has it been eroticised and stylized via fascist kitsch? Has it found a home or a counter-imaginary in science fiction? Is it linked with images of pestilence, viral contamination, deadly epidemics? What might resist its seepage and normalization?
Far from being contained as a one-off, geopolitically contained event, the Nazi-created concentrationary and its horrific extension, the exterminationary, initiated the political novelty that Arendt defined as totalitarianism. Totalitarianism was an experiment in the destruction of the human, which Arendt came to identify with spontaneity and plurality. Not confined to the Third Reich, the concentrationary was a feature of Stalin’s Soviet Union but also in differing guises is typical of racist societies and dictatorships. If the political lessons of the concentrationary universe led Hannah Arendt to seek to refound a basis for social life in the human condition, is the concentrationary imaginary continuing to put humanity, or our humanity, at risk?
In this conference we wish to investigate the often oblique manifestations of the legacies of the concentrationary in diverse forms of contemporary culture from literature, to cinema, and video games. Can aspects of the increasing obsessions with violence in media culture be related to an unacknowledged concentrationary legacy? Where is the concentrationary most visible? Is it identifiable by a lack of conscious memory that might continuously warn of its menace? In what forms has the concentrationary continued in political realizations, but also in their underlying imaginations and in imaginary forms? Where might we locate its signs? What are its effects on the subjectivities such cultural manifestations help to shape?
We suggest the following areas for the study of the emergence, persistence and transmogrification of a concentrationary imaginary and for seeking to challenge the continuing menace of that which the concentrationary universe and gulags initiated in the heart of twentieth century Europe.
Post Holocaust Political Theory, Fascinating Fascism Science Fiction and the Concentrationary Empire Contemporary Apocalyptic Art :Images of Fear Popular Culture, Racism and Others Counter-concentrationary Imaginaries Dark Times: Arendt’s Legacies in Cultural Theory and Practice Cinema and the Concentrationary Imaginary Identifying Sites of Cruelty Agamben and the Camp
To submit an abstract for a 20 minute paper download form and send directly to: conmem@leeds.ac.uk marked Concentrationary Imaginaries Conference 2011.
Deadline for the submission of abstracts: 1 November 2010. CentreCATH School of Fine Art, Old Mining Building, University of Leeds
E-mail: conmem@leeds.ac.uk
New book: Memory and Migration: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Memory Studies
Creet, Julia/Kitzmann, Andreas (eds), University of Toronto Press 2010.
Memory plays an integral part in how individuals and societies construct their identity. While memory is usually considered in the context of a stable, unchanging environment, this collection of essays explores the effects of immigration, forced expulsions, exile, banishment, and war on individual and collective memory. The ways in which memory affects cultural representation and historical understanding across generations is examined through case studies and theoretical approaches that underscore its mutability.
Memory and Migration is a truly interdisciplinary book featuring the work of leading scholars from a variety of fields across the globe. The essays are collaborative, successfully responding to the central theme and expanding upon the findings of individual authors. A groundbreaking contribution to an emerging field of study, Memory and Migration provides valuable insight into the connections between memory, place, and displacement.
For more information see here
International Praxis Conference on Cultural Memory and Coexistence
18-20 March 2011, Fatih University, Istanbul
Praxis Club was
founded in 2006 as an initiative of the Department of Sociology of Fatih
University, which aims to adopt an active role in fostering sociological
knowledge and imagination in Turkey with a commitment to
inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural research.
In addition to
fieldwork conducted by the members of Praxis, with particular focus on
Central Asia besides Turkey, Praxis hosted a series of conferences since
2006. Since then, Praxis has also brought together an interdisciplinary
group of scholars and policy-makers in its National Sociology
Congresses, the third of which was organized in May 2010. With the 1st
International Praxis Conference on Cultural Memory and Coexistence that
is to be organized after the three nationwide conferences, it is aimed
to improve inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural researches on cultural
memory, with particular focus on the potential of developing common
meanings and understandings.
Call for Papers
Literature
on cultural memory has extensively developed in the last two decades.
Several scholarly works and conferences have been dedicated to it. The
"new wars" (M. Kaldor, *New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global
Era*), as well as the current global paradigms drawing on the language
of clash have particularly reflected a strong link between cultural
memory and conflict. In opposition to the conventional thinking, this
conference aims to raise the fundamental question of how individual and
collective memories (M. Halbwachs, On Collective Memory) can generate
intercultural dialogue practices and therefore used as tools for
conflict resolution. We especially aim to generate research on how to
develop shared meanings and common understanding at the level of
ordinary people belonging to different cultural and ethno-religious
communities, therefore reproduce everyday cosmopolitanism. Some of the
fundamental questions that will be addressed in the conference are:
1.
How is cosmopolitanism experienced in everyday life and urban spaces by
members of different social groups?
2. Which are the ways in which
memories of conflict and collaboration are transmitted?
3. In what
ways coexistence is represented in members` and their communities`
symbolic domains?
4. Which are the instruments and roles played in
these transmission processes? (first-hand memoirs and narratives;
historiography and historians; spatial designs and architects; novels;
cinema etc.) 5. What are the ways of the construction and reconstruction
of gendered memories?
6. How the sites of memory, i.e. visual history
and museums, and imaginary topograhies function to shape the discourses
of conflict vis-à-vis experiences of coexistence and collaboration?
7.
What kinds of interactions or tensions are experienced between public
and private memories?
8. How do remembering and forgetting/amnesia
function in justifying the present and constructing the the future?
9.
How can the past be dealed through examples of the good?
10. How can
narratives and oral heritage be developed as a tool for understanding
and overcoming conflictual issues?
11. How can the constructive
experiences be adopted as shared models for the (re)building of
coexistence and inter-communal trust?
12. What can be the impacts of
local experiences on identity-formation at the regional and global level?
We
welcome proposals from senior as well as junior researchers from all
disciplines concerned with these debates and issues including
Anthropology, Architecture, Art History, World Literature, Fine Art,
History, Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology and Theology. The main
objective of the conference is to generate research and understanding of
how individual and cultural memories could facilitate a shared meaning
and common understanding vis-à-vis the discourses of clash, i.e.
civilizations, religions, and ethnic groups.
In addition to the
thematic panels, the conference will host photography exhibitions and
book panels as well as film presentations on cultural memory.
300-word
paper abstracts with a 200-word bio should be sent by 1 October 2010 to
Ali Murat Yel (e-mail:muratyel@gmail.com)
and Onder Cetin (e-mail:
o.cetin.isim@gmail.com). Selection of the
papers will be made on the basis of quality and relevance to the
conference themes. Selected papers will be published in a special volume
in English and in Turkish.
Deadlines:
- Submission of
abstracts: 1 October 2010
- Notification of acceptance of abstracts:
1 November 2010
- Submission of full papers: 1 January 2011
Call for Papers: International Association for Media and History (IAMHIST): Media History and Cultural Memory
University of Copenhagen, July 6-9, 2011
The International Association for Media and History (IAMHIST) is pleased to announce its XXIV biennial conference, ' on the theme of Media History and Cultural Memory, to be held at Copenhagen University 6-9 July 6 2011. The conference will look at the ways in which media history is interwoven with the concept of cultural memory. Media such as radio, television, film, and the internet are used to create, represent, transmit, revise, and preserve collective constructions of history and identity. Media hold complex and evolving roles in the ways that individuals and groups understand the moments and events of their pasts, at all levels of social organization (local, regional, national, transnational). These understandings inform policy, politics, and the performance of identity, laying the foundation for future interpretations and understandings, and carrying past and present affiliations, conflicts, glory, and trauma forward in time.
The conference will be organized around the following five subthemes. Proposals should include an indication of relevant subthemes to aid in the creation of panels.
Documenting and representing the past
- Archives and the politics of memory (selection, preservation, digitization, valorisation)
- Digital archives as/and memory
- History and/on TV / Film / Radio/ Video Games and other new media
- Museums and the politics of memory
- Heritage and preservation
Identity and Memory
- Individual / collective
- Regional / National / Transnational / Imperial and Colonial identity
- Religious memory
- Remembering progress / change
- Cohesion / Unification
Memories of Eras of Transition
- Cultural transitions
- Economic transitions
- Ideological transitions
- Political transitions
- Geographical transitions
Memory and Collective Trauma
- Media, collective trauma and the shaping of memories: media representations of genocide, wars, disasters, repression/oppression, dictatorial regimes...)
- Memory and 9/11
- Media and prosthetic memory
- Media and post-memory
Memory and commemoration
- Religion, identity and the (de)construction of memory
- Cultural diplomacy and identity branding
Proposals and inquiries should be directed to Karsten Fledelius at iamhist2011@gmail.com. The deadline for submissions is December 1, 2010. This conference is being organized by IAMHIST, in conjunction with the University of Copenhagen faculties of Humanities and Theology and The Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television.
International Praxis Conference on Cultural
Memory and Coexistence
18-20 March 2011, Fatih University, Istanbul
Praxis
Club was founded in 2006 as an initiative of the Department of Sociology
of Fatih University, which aims to adopt an active role in fostering
sociological knowledge and imagination in Turkey with a commitment to
inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural research.
In addition to
fieldwork conducted by the members of Praxis, with particular focus on
Central Asia besides Turkey, Praxis hosted a series of conferences since
2006. Since then, Praxis has also brought together an interdisciplinary
group of scholars and policy-makers in its National Sociology
Congresses, the third of which was organized in May 2010. With the 1st
International Praxis Conference on Cultural Memory and Coexistence that
is to be organized after the three nationwide conferences, it is aimed
to improve inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural researches on cultural
memory, with particular focus on the potential of developing common
meanings and understandings.
Call for Papers
Literature on cultural memory has extensively developed in the last two decades.
Several scholarly works and conferences have been dedicated to it. The
"new wars" (M. Kaldor, *New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global
Era*), as well as the current global paradigms drawing on the language
of clash have particularly reflected a strong link between cultural
memory and conflict. In opposition to the conventional thinking, this
conference aims to raise the fundamental question of how individual and
collective memories (M. Halbwachs, *On Collective Memory*) can generate
intercultural dialogue practices and therefore used as tools for
conflict resolution. We especially aim to generate research on how to
develop shared meanings and common understanding at the level of
ordinary people belonging to different cultural and ethno-religious
communities, therefore reproduce everyday cosmopolitanism. Some of the
fundamental questions that will be addressed in the conference are:
1.
How is cosmopolitanism experienced in everyday life and urban spaces by
members of different social groups?
2. Which are the ways in which
memories of conflict and collaboration are transmitted?
3. In what
ways coexistence is represented in members` and their communities`
symbolic domains?
4. Which are the instruments and roles played in
these transmission processes? (first-hand memoirs and narratives;
historiography and historians; spatial designs and architects; novels;
cinema etc.)
5. What are the ways of the construction and
reconstruction of gendered memories?
6. How the sites of memory, i.e.
visual history and museums, and imaginary topograhies
function to shape the discourses of conflict vis-à-vis experiences of
coexistence and collaboration?
7. What kinds of interactions or
tensions are experienced between public and private memories?
8. How
do remembering and forgetting/amnesia function in justifying the present
and constructing the the future?
9. How can the past be dealed
through examples of the good?
10. How can narratives and oral
heritage be developed as a tool for understanding and overcoming
conflictual issues?
11. How can the constructive experiences be
adopted as shared models for the (re)building of coexistence and
inter-communal trust?
12. What can be the impacts of local
experiences on identity-formation at the regional and global level?
We
welcome proposals from senior as well as junior researchers from all
disciplines concerned with these debates and issues including
Anthropology, Architecture, Art History, World Literature, Fine Art,
History, Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology and Theology. The main
objective of the conference is to generate research and understanding of
how individual and cultural memories could facilitate a shared meaning
and common understanding vis-à-vis the discourses of clash, i.e.
civilizations, religions, and ethnic groups.
In addition to the
thematic panels, the conference will host photography exhibitions and
book panels as well as film presentations on cultural memory.
300-word
paper abstracts with a 200-word bio should be sent by 1 October 2010 to
Ali Murat Yel (e-mail: muratyel@gmail.comc) and Onder Cetin
(e-mail:o.cetin.isim@gmail.come). Selection of the papers will be made
on the basis of quality and relevance to the conference themes. Selected
papers will be published in a special volume in English and in Turkish.
Deadlines:
-
Submission of abstracts: 1 October 2010
- Notification of acceptance
of abstracts: 1 November 2010
- Submission of full papers: 1 January
2011
1st Global Conference
Trauma - Theory and Practice
Monday
14th March – Wednesday 16th March 2011, Prague, Czech Republic
Call
for Papers
This inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary conference
seeks to examine and explore issues surrounding individual and
collective trauma, both in terms of practice, theory and lived reality.
Trauma studies have emerged from its foundation in psychoanalysis to be
a dominant methodology for understanding contemporary events and our
reactions to them. Critics have argued that we live in a “culture of
trauma”. Repeated images of suffering and death form our collective
and/or cultural unconscious. This inaugural conference seeks in
particular to explore the relation between trauma, memory and identity,
both national and collective.
In addition to academic analysis,
we welcome the submission of case studies or other approaches from those
involved with its practice, such as people in the medical profession and
therapists, victims of events which have resulted in traumas on either
an individual or mass scale, journalists or authors of fiction whose
work deals with trauma.
For further details about the conference please visit:
http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/at-the-interface/evil/trauma/call-for-papers/
International Praxis Conference on Cultural Memory and Coexistence, 18-20 March 2011, Fatih University, Istanbul
Prax·is Club was founded in 2006 as an initiative of the Department of
Sociology of Fatih University, which aims to adopt an active role in
fostering sociological knowledge and imagination in Turkey with a
commitment to inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural research.
In
addition to fieldworks conducted by the members of Prax·is, with
particular focus on Central Asia besides Turkey, Prax·is hosted a series
of conferences since 2006. Since then, Prax·is has also brought together
an
interdisciplinary group of scholars and policy-makers in its
National Sociology Congresses, the third of which was organized in May
2010. With the “1st International Praxis Conference on Cultural Memory
and Coexistence” that is to be organized after the three nationwide
conferences, it is aimed to improve inter-disciplinary and
cross-cultural researches on cultural memory, with particular focus on
the potential of developing common meanings and understandings.
Call
for Papers
Literature on cultural memory has extensively
developed in the last two decades. Several scholarly works and
conferences have been dedicated to it. The “new wars” (M. Kaldor, *New
and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era*), as well as the
current global paradigms drawing on the language of clash have
particularly reflected a strong link between cultural memory and
conflict. In opposition to the conventional thinking, this conference
aims to raise the fundamental question of how individual and collective
memories (M. Halbwachs, *On Collective Memory*) can generate
intercultural dialogue practices and therefore used as tools for
conflict resolution. We especially aim to generate research on how to
develop shared meanings and common understanding at the level of
ordinary people belonging to different cultural and ethno-religious
communities, therefore reproduce everyday cosmopolitanism. Some of the
fundamental questions that will be addressed in the conference are:
1. How is cosmopolitanism experienced in everyday life and urban spaces
by members of different social groups?
2. Which are the ways in
which memories of conflict and collaboration are transmitted?
3. In
what ways coexistence is represented in members` and their communities`
symbolic domains?
4. Which are the instruments and roles played in
these transmission processes? (first-hand memoirs and narratives;
historiography and historians; spatial designs and architects; novels;
cinema etc.)
5. What are the ways of the construction and
reconstruction of gendered memories?
6. How the sites of memory,
i.e. visual history and museums, and imaginary topograhies function to
shape the discourses of conflict vis-à-vis
experiences of
coexistence and collaboration?
7. What kinds of interactions or
tensions are experienced between public and private memories?
8.
How do remembering and forgetting/amnesia function in justifying the
present and constructing the the future?
9. How can the past be
dealed through examples of the good?
10. How can narratives and
oral heritage be developed as a tool for understanding and overcoming
conflictual issues?
11. How can the constructive experiences be
adopted as shared models for the (re)building of coexistence and
inter-communal trust?
12. What can be the impacts of local
experiences on identity-formation at the regional and global level?
We
welcome proposals from senior as well as junior researchers from all
disciplines concerned with these debates and issues including
Anthropology, Architecture, Art History, World Literature, Fine Art,
History, Philosophy, Political Science, Sociology and Theology. The main
objective of the conference is to generate research and understanding of
how individual and cultural memories could facilitate a shared meaning
and common understanding vis-à-vis the discourses of clash, i.e.
civilizations, religions, and ethnic groups.
In addition to the
thematic panels, the conference will host photography exhibitions and
book panels as well as film presentations on cultural memory.
300-word
paper abstracts with a 200-word bio should be sent by 1 October 2010 to
Ali Murat Yel (e-mail: muratyel@gmail.com) and Onder Cetin (e-mail:
o.cetin.isim@gmail.com). Selection of the papers will be made on the
basis of quality and relevance to the conference themes. Selected papers
will be published in a special volume in English and in Turkish.
Deadlines:
- Submission of abstracts: 1 October 2010
-
Notification of acceptance of abstracts: 1 November 2010
-
Submission of full papers: 1 January 2011
Memory and Collective Identity in Comparative
Literature and Others
Call for Papers Date: 2010-11-09
Memory
has lately become a central concern in contemporary culture and politics
of all societies in a global scale. This “memory boom”, originated in
socio-historical, political, cultural, technological and market-oriented
reasons, is articulated around a certain “memory industry”, which in
turn generates identity discourses. Cultural products play a fundamental
role in the formation and consolidation of these discourses.
On
the one hand, the rehabilitation of the memory of wars, dictatorships,
killings and genocides tries to rescue from oblivion a traumatic past.
There is also a willingness of discursive democratization (represented
by the promotion of testimonial literature), looking to break through
that version of history written by the winning side. Also, the need to
look towards the past as a means of understanding the present is often
emphasized, to increase the new generations’ awareness of the need to
avoid the repetition of the same atrocities. Therefore, new
historiographic methodologies have vindicated the incorporation of new
and different perspectives that had traditionally been excluded from the
construction of discourses.
Nevertheless, the notion of
discursive elaboration of memories, together with the fact that
discourses about the past are always filtered by the interests and
beliefs of the present, make it necessary for this new historiography to
be constantly under scrutiny by a critical analysis. This would reveal
possible “abuses of memory” (term coined by Todorov in the text with the
same title) denounced by many authors, politicians, journalists and
human rights activists. It is particularly interesting as well as
complex to work on the relationship that can be established between the
constant re-writing of the past and the construction of collective
identities. As Halbwachs explains, collective memory puts together the
past and the present, as well as the individual and the social group. It
is in this sense that we are also interested in the different discursive
strategies that several authors have developed to reconstruct their
memories from a subjective vision of the present. This also allows us to
establish a link between certain forms of narration and the different
underlying ideological intentions. One of the characteristics that make
memory studies difficult is the specificity of each political
vindication, and also their fluctuating character in relation to
present-day socio-political factors. However, at the same time, in a
global world of linked identities and politics, “different discourses on
historical memory are intertwined and overlap each other all throughout
the world, trespassing frontiers and bouncing against each other,
sometimes hiding and forgetting their own historical memory, sometimes
reinforcing it", as claimed by Huyssen in an interview for Metropolis
magazine.
Taking as starting point, then, the fact that the
restoration of the past is subject to the ideologies of the present; and
also that memory studies are not only a tool for analysis, but also for
the transformation of contemporary contexts, we want to vindicate a
critical role that can distinguish between the "obligation of memory”
(which introduces an ethical evaluation of its own look towards the
past, as pointed out by Lozano Aguilar in Decir, contar, pensar la
guerra), and the possible political abuses that derivate from these
vindications. We also believe that a fundamental role of criticism is to
suggest, as long as it is possible, new strategies to go beyond
militaristic discourses. We propose therefore the following lines of
research for this monographic issue:
a. –Relations between
cultural production, memory discourses and the construction of
collective identities.
b. –Studies on testimonial literature.
Relations between individual and collective memory.
c. –The fluctuant
nature of identity: transformation of the perspective of memory
according to the social-historical context.
d. –Relations between
narrative strategies and the ideology of memories.
e. –Analysis of
the political capitalization of cultural productions on memory.
f.
–Strategies to overcome memory discourses.
g. –Memory
discourses as trans-border political discourses. Analysis, through
cultural products, of the influence of different discourses on different
geographical areas.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Edifici
d'estudiants – Edifici R.
Campus Bellaterra – Barcelona.08193
Email:
redaccion@452f.com
Visit the website at http://www.452f.com
Gender and Memory in European Literature, Film and Visual Art, 30 September and 1 October
Birkbeck College, University of London.
Conference venue: 30 September Room G01, 43 Gordon Square, London, WC1H
0PD; 1 October Room MAL 541, Main Building, Malet Street, Bloomsbury,
London,
WC1E 7HX
This conference will set out to explore
relationships between gender and memory as they have been articulated in
literature and film within a European context since the 18th century.
Key questions to be examined will include:
Are ways of relating
to the past gendered? To what extent are different roles assigned to men
and women within memory discourses? Who remembers and who is (not)
remembered? Does the divide between public memory and private memory
have a gender dimension? Are communicative memory and cultural memory
(differently) gendered? To what extent are different memory genres/media
(autobiography, novel/fiction, film) gendered? Do different memory
concepts (mourning, nostalgia, memorialisation) have gendered
connotations? In what ways are the relationship of men and women to
memory and its discourses historically and culturally contingent? Can
remembering and forgetting have gender political dimensions? To whose
memories are value assigned in different cultural/historical contexts?
What kinds of (gendered) memory community have been established? Who
owns memory?
In order that these questions can be explored in
inter- and cross-disciplinary fashion, the conference will seek to bring
together scholars working on memory and gender in a variety of different
fields, including English and Humanities, Modern Languages, Media and
Film Studies.
For the programme and other information see
http://www.bbk.ac.uk/brrkc/events.html
Spring school 2011: Global History: Connected Histories or a
History of Connections? London, 11-14 April 2011
Organisers:
• Antje Flüchter, Roland Wenzlhuemer
(Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context”, Heidelberg
University)
• Ulf Engel (Graduate School “Critical Junctures of
Globalization”, Research Academy, University of Leipzig)
•
Matthias Middell (Global and European Studies Institute, University of
Leipzig)
• Katja Naumann (Geisteswissenschaftliches Zentrum
Geschichte und Kultur Ostmitteleuropas (GWZO), University of Leipzig)
•
Andreas Gestrich, Silke Strickrodt (German Historical Institute London)
Applications
are invited for the spring school “Global History: Connected Histories
or a History of Connections?” that will take place in London from 11-14
April 2011. The spring school is jointly
organized by Heidelberg
University, the University of Leipzig and the German Historical
Institute London. The school cooperates with the
Third European
Congress on World and Global History hosted by the London School of
Economics and Political Science and provides an ideal introduction to
the main congress theme of connections and comparisons. In recent years,
Global History has firmly established itself as a new and highly
productive field of historical research.
An allegedly ephemeral historiographical fashion has
proved to be a well-grounded and well-respected research perspective.
And yet the question of what Global History actually is and what its
practitioners ought to research and teach is still hotly debated. The
often confusing multitude of differing opinions on this question can at
times be hard to come to terms with – especially for researchers at the
start of their careers. Therefore, the organisers think it desirable to
discuss some of the aspects of this problem in the form of a spring
school to be held in close temporal and spatial proximity to the Third
European Congress on World and Global History. Referring to the overall
congress theme of Connections and Comparisons, the spring school has the
title Global History: Connected Histories or a History of Connections?
and will focus on two distinct approaches to Global History that
particularly illustrate the differing presuppositions and intended
insights informing research in the field. It is one of the distinct
traits of Global History not to accept the presupposition of
self-contained, autonomous cultures, societies or nations as principal
units of investigation. Hence, terms and concepts such as connections,
connecting or connectedness are close to the core of almost every
historical study in the field. And still the concept of connections can
be operationalised in very different ways reflecting the different
possible
approaches to the purpose of Global History. The first approach that we
have chosen to call connected histories builds on the presupposition of
globality, of global entanglements, that provide the context for the
historical processes under scrutiny. No matter if one, two or more
cultures or societies are looked at, they must always be treated and
assessed as connected and entangled with others. But as important as
they may be, the connections
themselves merely form the background,
the context of the analysis, while the people, things and entities
connected stand in the focus of
research. In this way, statehood or
state building – to name but one example – are examined as embedded in
global spaces of communication
and interaction rather than as
principally endogenous and autonomous processes.
The history of
connections-approach, on the other hand, primarily looks at the
emergence and functioning of globality by way of global
connections.
Here, the connections themselves constitute the object of research,
while that which has been connected mainly provides the
research
context. This research approach often leaves traditional understandings
of space behind and focuses on the rationale and the local impact of the
emerging global sphere. The study of the emergence of a global telegraph
network and its transformative impact on global spaces of communication
and interaction can serve as an illustrative example here. The history
of connections-approach focuses on distinct topics and subjects that
have had a formative impact on our global(ised) world and whose analysis
helps to explain and understand current problems of
(and in)
globalisation. The connected histories-approach allows the researcher to
throw new light on established topics that have previously been viewed
exclusively in the context of the nation state or other self-contained
entities and to carry a global and exchange-oriented perspective into
this field.
Of course, none of the two approaches is better, faster,
more useful or, indeed, “more Global History” than the other. Rather
they reflect
the research questions and desired insights of the
historian. The spring school seeks to highlight both the differences and
the similarities between the two approaches and also aims at exemplifying
the
connection between the historian’s questions and the chosen perspective
on Global History. It wants to provide PhD students in the field of
Global History with an opportunity to study these concepts. This will
encompass in-depth discussion with renowned experts in the field, the
reading and interpreting of key texts together as well as the
presentation and discussion of the participants’ own research projects
in the light of the spring school’s principal questions.
Applications for participation in the spring school
should be in English and contain a letter of motivation, an outline of
the research project to be presented (1.000-1.500 words) and two letters
of
reference. They must be sent electronically to Antje Flüchter
(fluechter@asia-europe.uni-heidelberg.de) by 31 August 2010.
Successful applicants will be required to present their
projects at the spring school (in German, English or French). The fee
for participation is 85 Euro. A limited number of scholarships will be
available
for participants from less-privileged backgrounds and need to be applied
for separately.
Dr. Antje Flüchter
Karl Jaspers Centre
Vossstr.
2
D-69115 Heidelberg
Germany
Email:
fluechter@asia-europe.uni-heidelberg.de
Australasian Association for Communist and
Post-Communist Studies (AACaPS) Tenth Biennial Conference (2011)
February
3-4, 2011, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
The
Australasian Association for Communist and Post-Communist Studies
invites proposals for panels and papers for the 10th Biennial
Conference
to be held at the ANU in Canberra on 3-4 February 2011. The event will
be hosted by the Centre for Arab and Islamic Studies (the Middle East
and Central Asia), College of Arts and Social Sciences.
The
Conference theme is ?Two Decades without the Soviet Union:
Transformations in Eurasian Space?.
Proposals for panels and
paper topics relating to all aspects of scholarship in the social
sciences and humanities which explore trajectories of change in the
former USSR and the Eastern Bloc will be welcome. Existing panels, their
themes and chairpersons are listed below:
- Market reforms in the
former Soviet Union (Chair: Stephen Fortescue, UNSW)
- Russian
foreign policy in the Near Abroad (Chair: Roderic Pitty, UWA)
-
Cultural and educational aspects of transformation (Chair: Kevin Windle,
ANU)
- Nationalism and politics of identity in Central Asia (Chair:
Kirill Nourzhanov, ANU)
Submission of Proposals
FOR PAPER
PRESENTERS: 1) name, 2) current institutional affiliation, 3)
title/position, 4) e-mail address, 5) postal address, 6) telephone
number,
7) fax number, 8) title of paper, 9) abstract of paper (200 words or
less), 10) any audio-visual equipment required (specify:
overhead
projector, slide projector, DVD/video player), 11) a brief CV containing
information for panel chairperson's introduction.
FOR PANELS: In
addition to the information for paper presenters (see above), the
following are also required: 1) title for proposed panel, 2) name,
affiliation and contact information of the panel chair and discussants.
Deadlines:
for proposed panels, 31 August 2010; for papers, 29 October 2010.
Publication
of Proceedings
Select papers presented at the conference will be
published either in an edited volume or in a peer-reviewed Web-based
collection. Detailed
information about an editorial board and
guidelines for submitting a complete paper will be added soon.
Important
dates:
- abstract acceptance notification issued 5 November 2010
-
final copy of the paper submitted 11 January 2011
Conference
Registration Fees
- AACaPS full members A$50
- Non-members A$80
-
Full-time students and other concessional A$50
Funding
AACaPS
does not have funds to support the costs of conference participation.
Participants should obtain their own funding.
AACaPS website:
sites.google.com/site/aacpssite/
Conference Information and
Registration
The conference website is http://cais.anu.edu.au/aacaps2011
Contacts
Conference-related
correspondence should be addressed to the
conference convenor:
Dr
Kirill Nourzhanov
CAIS
Australian National University
Canberra,
ACT 0200
Australia
Tel. 61 2 6125 8374
Fax 61 2 6125 5410
E-mail
kirill.nourzhanov@anu.edu.au
Call for Papers: Forms and Functions of Social
Memories -- Perspectives from Social and Cultural Sciences
University of Erlangen, 10-12 December 2010
Call for Papers Date: 2010-09-30
The conference
"Forms and Functions of Social Memories -- Perspectives from Social and
Cultural Sciences" takes place at the Institute for Sociology of the
University of Erlangen. It starts at December 10th and ends December
12th around noon. It is planned as a mixture between plenary and panel
sessions.
Please send a 500 words proposal for a 30 min. paper by
September 30th, 2010 to: info@soziale-erinnerung.de. The acceptances
will be sent at the end of october. For further information have a look
at http://www.soziale-erinnerung.de.
The
conference aims at collecting and re-considering the manifold empirical
research on social memories on behalf of their theoretical potential. It
is an astonishing fact, that despite of a lot of research in social and
cultural sciences on social memories there are rather few comprehensive
theoretical considerations. Therefore, we want to set the focus on the
integration of different theoretical approaches and empirical research.
In
the self-definition of modernity multiple social memories take the place
of the "Great Narrative" on different levels that don't have to be
compatible. A theory of social memories faces the problem of integrating
social dynamics, cultural pluralisation and processes of social
differentiation without ignoring contexts of interactions like families
or milieus. However, the circulating terms and definitions of forms of
social memories should not just be placed side by side. Instead we want
to focus, empirically and theoretically, on the processes of formation
and constitution that underlie these conceptualizations to work out both
lines of conflict and potentials of integration.
The conference
would like to discuss theoretical concepts and empirical studies
concerning social memories in an interdisciplinary framework. Based on
these discussions we would like to ask for theoretical enhancements.
From performative acts to narrative situations of interaction or
discourse, constructions and representations of the past should be
observed in conjunction with problems like oblivion, authenticity,
factuality and validity or breaches in the transmission of the past. On
the one hand the future directedness of social memories in form of again
and again constituted horizons of expectations should be clarified. On
the other hand it is deemed to analyse social memories in their function
as mechanisms of "Transmission" regarding the specific selectivities
that evolve at the intersections (of persons, groups, generations,
discourses, etc.) and that constitute the specific relationship between
remembrance and oblivion. According to this, the definition of the
particular functionality of memories for the processes of social and
individual formation of meaning is important, on both counts
biographically and systemically.
Of equal importance is the
reflection of institutionalised remembrance and of the own position of a
speaker: Scientists are directly or indirectly involved in the practice
of (institutionalised) remembrance and therefore are facing the
challenge of concerning themselves with its contexts, conditions,
(political) purpose and the implicit ideologies.
We have invited
the following speakers: Paul Connerton (Oxford/UK), Elena Esposito
(Modena/Reggio Emilia/ Italy), Mary Fulbrook (London/UK), Jeffrey K.
Olick (Virginia/USA), Gabriele Rosenthal (Goettingen/Germany), Joanna
Tokarska-Bakir (Warsaw/Poland), Christian Gudehus (Essen/Germany)
Topics
include:
· Individual -- Interaction -- Society: boundaries and
transitions between the different forms of memories.
· Metaphors,
terms and forms of social memories and their conditions of formation
·
Influence of social differentiation on social remembrance (generations,
classes, cultural pluralisation, gender, etc.)
· Transformation of
social memories (interdependency of social transformationsprocesses and
social memories)
· Facticity, authenticity and the realm of experience
·
Media, discourse and their functions for remembrance
·
Re-presentations of the past (body memory, rituals, sites of
remembrance, etc.)
· Social and individual practices of remembrance
·
Transgenerational transmission and breaches of tradition
·
Remembrance and oblivion between institution, power and ideology
The
conference languages will be English and German. The presentations are
intended to be published in a special volume of a sociological journal
after the conference.
Memory, Mediation, Remediation: An International Conference on Memory in Literature and Film
April 28-30 2011, Wilfred Laurier University
Memory Studies has recently been
established as one of the most urgent contemporary interdisciplinary
fields.Wilfrid Laurier University’s
Department of English and Film Studies is hosting an international
conference on the theme of “Memory, Mediation, Remediation” as part of
the university’s 100th year celebration. The conference
examines not merely the representation and
redefining of memory (and history, and nostalgia, etc.) in both literary
and filmic texts, but also the question of the degree to which either
individual or social memory gets constituted, legitimized and
‘naturalized’ through narrative or visual media forms. Ultimately, this
conference hopes to provide a venue for the exploration of literature
and cinema as themselves veritable modes of memory, in the shape of
allusion, adaptation, remediation, translation, intertextuality, and
appropriation.
Today, the word ‘memory’ acts as a catch-all for: (a) the process of recollection or retrieval; (b) the form or ‘place’ in which memory-content is both stored and lost (the archive); and (c) the mnemic content itself, what is commonly referred to as a ‘memory’. This imprecision is exacerbated by the confusion and conflation of personal ‘natural’ memory and forms of collective ‘cultural memory’ which as often as not is another way of talking about ‘history.’ Modern theorists of memory recognize that in speaking of memory one is describing not a unitary subjective phenomenon but a grouping of cognitive functions – or, in terms more amenable to this conference, a constellation of interconnected metaphors. These metaphors continue to be both familiar and powerful, most notably in terms of modernity’s stubborn insistence on memory’s spatial nature.
This conference seeks to extend the exploration of received modes and theories of the representation of memory to a consideration of 21st century globalized values and ideas. ‘Collective,’ ‘social’ or ‘cultural’ memory are not new ideas, but we would encourage exploration what it means to think of "culture" itself as a global memory system; as both source of and storehouse for a society’s most cherished values, ideals, and ideologies.
Please send a 500 word proposal and a one-page cv by August 16, 2010 to:
Russ Kilbourn or Eleanor Ty
Department of English and Film Studies
Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5
rkilbourn@wlu.ca or ety@wlu.ca
www.wlu.ca/arts/film/memory2011
Featured Speakers include:
Marlene Kadar, York University
Co-editor of Photographs, Histories, Meanings (Palgrave 2009) and Tracing the Autobiographical (Life Writing) (Wilfrid Laurier University Press 2005)
Alison Landsberg, George Mason University
Author of Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture (Columbia University Press 2004)
Sarah Henstra, Ryerson University
Author of The Counter-Memorial Impulse in Twentieth Century English Fiction (Palgrave 2009)
The (Re)use and Interpretation of Research Materials, Helsinki,
2–3 December 2010
Papers are invited for
contributions to the Oral History and Fieldwork – The (Re)use and
Interpretation of Research Materials symposium hosted by the Finnish
Literature Society in collaboration with the Finnish Oral History
Network (FOHN) and The Academy of Finland project Strangers from the
East – Narratives of Karelian Exiles and Re-immigrants from Russia
Regarding their Integration in Finland 2009-2012 (lead by Dr. Outi
Fingerroos).
The event will be the third international symposium
organized by the Finnish Oral History Network. We aim to stimulate
discussion and bring together scholars interested in fieldwork
methodology within oral history research. The symposium will offer a
discussion forum for researchers working in the field. The keynote
speakers are Molly Andrews (University of East London, United Kingdom)
and Selma Leydesdorff (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Fieldwork
methodology has been discussed in oral history research since the late
1970s when the oral history interview was reconceptualized as a
dialogically constructed text. The oral history interview was seen as a
dialogical process in which both participants – the interviewee and the
interviewer – took part, and the reflection of the research process has
become self-evident. Methodological issues initially identified
concerned the conduct, processing, and preservation of oral history
materials. Subsequently the concept of field has been elaborated and is
now used to refer to archived research materials, e.g. oral history
interviews, written autobiographies, questionnaires and photographs, and
their later use.
In recent years the focus of fieldwork
methodology has turned to the secondary analysis of oral history
materials, in other words the use and reuse of archived oral history and
life-history materials.Methodological, ethical and theoretical issues
have to be considered at all stages of research. The research process
grows even more demanding when the researcher uses multiple sources and
types of research material instead of keeping to one primary research
material. Does this only cause problems and flaws as some have
suggested? How have researchers tackled methodological and practical
challenges related to the reuse of research materials? Can all research
materials be reused and for what kind of research purposes?
We
welcome scholars working within the field of oral and life history.
Proposals may be submitted for individual papers or workshop sessions.
The programme will include keynote lectures, paper sessions and a final
panel. The principal conference language will be English.
Participants
of workshops are invited to send abstracts to the organizers. Workshop
paper proposals should include a title and a maximum 250 word abstract.
Please send us a single page proposal including the title of the
presentation, the abstract and the following information:
- name
(with your surname in CAPITAL letters)
- affiliation
- postal
address
- e-mail address
- telephone and fax numbers
Proposals
will be evaluated according to their focus on the topic.Proposals must
be written in English. Please e-mail your proposal as an e-mail
attachment by 22 May 2010 to fohn@finlit.fi. The acceptance or rejection
of proposals will be announced by 30 June 2010. The deadline for the
papers is 30 October 2010.
The admission to the symposium is 35€.
Enquiries:
fohn@finlit.fi
Book review: Buchinger, Kristin; Gantet, Claire;
Vogel, Jakob (Hrsg.): Europäische
Erinnerungsräume.
Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag 2009. ISBN
978-3-593-38865-6; 311 S.; EUR 34,90.
Reviewed by Claudia
Baumann, Leipzig
The review can be read here
Uppdaterad: 2010-11-08